![]() |
|
| <info@oxwablibdems.org.uk> |
European Parliament tries again to end secrecy in European Institutions3.59.00pm GMT Wed 11th Mar 2009
The European Parliament has voted in favour of stronger rules on freedom of information which would considerably enlarge access to EU files. Their report calls for all legislative documents to be publicly available via a website shared between the main EU bodies, and calls for a comprehensive register of lobbyists. The changes would strengthen a 2001 EU regulation of which the EU institutions and EU governments have obstructed the full implementation, resulting in several European Court of Justice rulings. Sarah Ludford MEP, Liberal Democrat European Justice & Human Rights Spokeswoman, said: "The tendency towards secrecy within the EU institutions, whether actual or perceived, does them no favours at all. If European citizens are to be convinced of the value of the work and the laws that the EU produces then they must be able to follow each step in the legislative process. Neither legislators nor officials should be able to hide behind a curtain of confidentiality." Members of the European Parliament have been demanding amended rules which make rights to information clearer and reduce the scope for obstruction. Working on a proposed new draft, they have extended the scope to electronic data, demanded justification for any restriction of access, a 2 week deadline for applications, with documents to be placed on a register. Sarah Ludford explained: "It is up to the European Parliament, as the representative body of Europe's citizens, to take a strong lead on transparency. It is particularly important that a majority of MEPs - though without the full support of the Socialist and Conservative groups - backed a Liberal Democrat amendment to make public, on a searchable website, information on EU spending and beneficiaries of EU grants and funds."
Bookmark this story at:
Published and promoted by Oxford West and Abingdon Liberal Democrats, 27 Park End St, Oxford OX1 1HU. The views expressed are those of the party, not of the service provider. |